![]() Validation of the lidar measurements using ozonesondes has shown that the uncertainties for 10-min retrievals are less than 10% at the near range and less than 20% at the far range. Multiple receiver systems can extend the dynamic range of the counting system and, therefore, increase the measurable range. The lidar consists of three receivers with 2.5, 10, and 40-cm diameter primary mirrors. This system retrieves ozone between 0.1 and ~12 km AGL with a typical integration time of 10 min and vertical resolution of 150 m in the PBL to ~750 m at upper troposphere. The Rocket-city O3 Quality Evaluation in the Troposphere (RO3QET) lidar, located at ~206 m ASL and (34.73N, 86.65W), was developed jointly by University of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH) and NASA’s GSFC. Advance our understanding of processes controlling regional background atmospheric composition (including STE and long range transport) and their effect on surface air quality to prepare for the GEO-CAPE era.Improve our understanding of the relationship between ozone and aerosols aloft and surface ozone and PM values.Exploit synergy with DISCOVER AQ, thermodynamic profilers, MOZAIC/IAGOS, regulatory surface monitors, and other networks.Foster use of these high-resolution ozone observations to improve the processes in air-quality forecast and diagnostic models.Discover new structures and processes at the PBL/FT boundary, especially in the diurnal variation of that interface.Provide high spatio-temporal observations of PBL and FT ozone for use by the GEO-CAPE science team to study the character of the atmospheric structure that GEO-CAPE will observe and assess the fidelity with which a geo instrument can measure that structure.Science Investigations Addressed by the Air Quality Lidar Network Objective (basic research) by engaging the research community with the data obtained by the near-term lidars. If that recommended solution does not require technology development, we would explore a commercial avenue for production of the network instrument. If the recommended solution requires technology development, we would propose to coordinate that funding through ESTO/IIP/SBIR conduits. We propose to achieve the second objective (network brassboard design) through working-group study of current and These engineeringĬhanges are not technology development and incur minimal risk. To achieve the first objective (measurements in the near term), we propose engineering changes to existing ozone lidars to make them suitable to our objectives. The third focus of the use of these lidar data resides in basic scientific research into the processes creating and destroying the ubiquitously observed ozone laminae. Scientists and managers who increasingly express a desire for ozone profiles. A second objective is to identify a brassboard ozone lidar instrument that would be suitable to populate a network to address the needs of NASA/EPA/NOAA air-quality Study the character of lower-atmospheric ozone and also assess the accuracy and vertical resolution with which a geosynchronous instrument could retrieve the observed laminar ozone With these observations of the detailed ozone structure, the GEO CAPE science team will be able to Proxies for the high time resolved observations from a geosynchronous satellite. These high-fidelity measurements will provide the GEO-CAPE science team with accurate representations of the PBL and FT ozone structure as I swear on Focal Blade - but you'll find enough people who don't see any benefit using this particular tool.Ĭ1's sharpening is really pretty good if you don't print large and when you want to apply some sharpening right in the raw processor.The primary scientific objective is to provide time/height ozone measurements from near the surface to the top of the troposphere to describe in high-fidelity their Some swear on, say, Topaz (personally I hate it). it's well worth to spend some time experimenting rather than just buying a tool. Depending on the final print size the third stage is Focal Blade again. Second stage is mostly some kind of masked highpass sharpening (in Photoshop, of course). Sometimes I also use Deconvultion Sharpening in Lightroom (low radius, "Details" set to 100, moderate amount). The first step is mostly Focal Blade (Photoshop Plugin whith sophistcated masking capabilities to avoid halos, to exclude balcks and whites from sharpening and with the ability to set an extremely low radius). May I ask what tool you use for the ouput sharpening then?I always apply a 2 or 3 step sharpening (except for downsized images prepared for the web). I do apply some sharpening for preview purposes in C1 but disable sharpening when processing. When you say that you "process captures out of C1 without sharpening applied", do you mean that you click the "Disable sharpening" checkbox in the output recipe?yes, exactly. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |